-
胡善慶:華裔是“永久的外國人”?對FISA修正案及702條款的分析
關鍵字: 外國情報監察法修正案702條款公民權利排華法案參考文獻:
[1] Congress.gov (n.d.). S.1297 - A bill to make title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 permanent, and for other purposes. http://bit.ly/2r7sD0K.
[2] Washington Post (2013). Declassified documents show NSA listened in on MLK, Muhammad Ali and Art Buchwald. http://wapo.st/2rmdyfK.
[3] National Public Radio (2012). The History Of The FBI's Secret 'Enemies' List. http://n.pr/2swjjaJ.
[4] New York Times (2006). While Nixon Campaigned, the F.B.I. Watched John Lennon. http://nyti.ms/2s5AYTP.
[5] Wikipedia (n.d.). Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. http://bit.ly/2r7i79c.
[6] CNN (2017). What is the FISA court, and why is it so secretive? http://cnn.it/2r8Qk86.
[7] Ambinder, Marc (2010). Minimization: A Term You Need To Know. The Atlantic Magazine. http://theatln.tc/2rcfweR. [8] Wikipedia (n.d.). Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 Amendments Act of 2008. http://bit.ly/1NvPEUw.
[9] Legal Information Institute (n.d.). 50 U.S. Code § 1801 – Definitions. http://bit.ly/2rspPLP.
[10] Legal Information Institute (n.d.). 50 U.S. Code § 1881a - Procedures for targeting certain persons outside the United States other than United States persons. http://bit.ly/2szfuBi.
[11] Congressional Research Service (2013). Reauthorization of the FISA Amendments Act. http://bit.ly/2rZE11e.
[12] Federation of American Scientists (n.d.). Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. http://bit.ly/2rPK4p5.
[13] Federation of American Scientists (n.d.). Section 702. http://bit.ly/2sn33Z1.
[14] Wikipedia (n.d.). Edward Snowden. http://bit.ly/2qA3IWQ.
[15] Washington Post (2017). Republicans claim Trump may have been surveilled through ‘incidental collection.’ What’s incidental collection? http://wapo.st/2swCtwD.
[16] Greene, Robyn (2017). It’s not Just Trump. We are All Victims of ‘Incidental Collection’. Newsweek Opinion. http://bit.ly/2sjVbVZ.
[17] Washington Post (2014). In NSA-intercepted data, those not targeted far outnumber the foreigners who are. http://wapo.st/2rgZrEl.
[18] Washington Post (2014). How 160,000 intercepted communications led to our latest NSA story. http://wapo.st/2sadRt5.
[19] Washington Post (2013). U.S., British intelligence mining data from nine U.S. Internet companies in broad secret program. http://wapo.st/2s9ZIKP.
[20] Wikipedia (n.d.). PRISM (surveillance program). http://bit.ly/1UaAQfk.
[21] Washington Post (2013). NSA slide shows surveillance of undersea cables. http://wapo.st/2sGL8ga.
[22] Wikipedia (n.d.). Upstream collection. http://bit.ly/2sitTiE.
[23] The Guardian (2013). NSA loophole allows warrantless search for US citizens' emails and phone calls. http://bit.ly/2pvtfQT.
[24] New York Times (2013). A Secret Surveillance Program Proves Challengeable in Theory Only. http://nyti.ms/2sECL4t.
[25] Toomey, Patrick (2015). Why Aren’t Criminal Defendants Getting Notice of Section 702 Surveillance — Again? Justsecurity.org. http://bit.ly/2rF6JpV.
[26] Legal Information Institute (n.d.). 50 U.S. Code § 1806 - Use of information. Cornell Law School. http://bit.ly/2sHr4L5.
[27] Newsweek (2016). How a Chinese Spy Case Turned into One Man’s Child Porn Nightmare. http://bit.ly/1WgXmow.
[28] Independent (2016). Does this case show the FBI is going too far to defend the US from Chinese spies? http://ind.pn/2ta0DKv.
[29] Reuters (2013). Exclusive: U.S. directs agents to cover up program used to investigate Americans. http://reut.rs/2sgkee9.
[30] Office of the Director of National Intelligence (2017). U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Opinion and Order. http://bit.ly/2s0vGJg.
[31] Miami Herald (2017). Secret court rebukes NSA for 5-year illegal surveillance of U.S. citizens. http://hrld.us/2rzXzpQ.
[32] Fox News (2017). Obama’s NSA rebuked for snooping on Americans; journo says it proves wide pattern. http://fxn.ws/2rktkmF.
[33] CNN (2017). 'Unmasking,' FISA and other terms to help you understand the wiretapping story. http://cnn.it/2sw8va2.
[34] American Civil Liberties Union (2017). The Government Is 'Incidentally' Sucking Up Tens of Millions of Americans’ Communications a Year, and It’s a Privacy Nightmare. http://bit.ly/2twBbir.
[35] Slate (2013). How to Decode the True Meaning What NSA Officials Say. http://slate.me/2tlKWjw.
[36] CNS News (2017). Democrat on FISA Last Week: ‘More and More Americans Are Getting Swept Up in the Searches’. http://bit.ly/2tadDjk.
[37] Reuters (2017). NSA backtracks on sharing number of Americans caught in warrant-less spying. http://reut.rs/2sGlQ28.
[38] National Security Agency (2013). Facts on the Collection of Intelligence Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. http://bit.ly/2rC8xjh.
[39] U.S. House of Representatives (n.d.). FISA 702. Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. http://bit.ly/2sishYG.
[40] Kim, Andrew (2017). Prosecuting Chinese “Spies:” An Empirical Analysis of the Economic Espionage Act. Committee of 100. http://bit.ly/2qXKHNf.
[41] CNN (2015). FBI sees Chinese involvement amid sharp rise in economic espionage cases. http://cnn.it/2rNVw6n.
[42] Sherry Chen Legal Defense Fund (n.d.). MSPB Hearing: Sherry Chen vs Department of Commerce. http://bit.ly/2lctBbN.
[43] Wu, Jeremy (2017). What Every U.S. Person Should Know and Do about Professor Xiaoxing Xi’s Suit. http://bit.ly/2raoPxY.
[44] Scientific American (2007). Confirmed: The U.S. Census Bureau Gave Up Names of Japanese-Americans in WW II. http://bit.ly/2gD5Ade.
[45] Wikipedia (n.d.). Murder of Vincent Chin. http://bit.ly/2asSRBS.
[46] Wikipedia (n.d.). Murder of Balbir Singh Sodhi. http://bit.ly/2aoJY0S.
[47] New York Times (2001). The Making of a Suspect: The Case of Wen Ho Lee. http://nyti.ms/2tRoK0K.
[48] Wu, Jeremy (2016). The Dark Side of Big Data and Predictive Analytics? http://bit.ly/1XMUWgs.
[49] Human Rights Watch (2017). Impact of Warrantless Section 702 Surveillance on People in the United States. http://bit.ly/2qpoo0a.
[50] Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law (n.d.). Are They Allowed to Do That? A Breakdown of Selected Government Surveillance Programs. http://bit.ly/2txhaIB.
[51] Public Broadcasting Service (2014). United States of Secrets, two-part documentary. http://to.pbs.org/2pG8BcS.
[52] Electronic Privacy Information Center (n.d.). Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). http://bit.ly/2rFcQpp.
[53] Center on Privacy and Technology at Georgetown University Law School (2017). The Color of Surveillance: Government Monitoring of American Immigrants. http://bit.ly/2sIdFST.
[54] American Civil Liberties Union (2016). ACLU v. FBI - FISA Court Motions Requesting Public Access to Rulings on NSA Bulk Surveillance. http://bit.ly/2sYFSF1.
[55] Electronic Frontier Foundation (n.d.). In response to EFF lawsuit, DOJ releases 18 new opinions of the FISC concerning Section 702. http://bit.ly/2twJYRp.
[56] American Civil Liberties Union (2017). ACLU Letter for the Record on House Judiciary Committee Hearing on “Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.” http://bit.ly/2tbNS2I.
[57] Shuman, Daniel and Vitka, Sean (2017). Drawing a Line on Mass Surveillance: How Congress Must Reform Section 702. Justsecurity.org. http://bit.ly/2rF74IY.
[58] Fourth Amendment Caucus (n.d.). 4th Amendment Caucus Launched. http://bit.ly/2qjfC4x.
[59] Fourth Amendment Advisory Committee (n.d.). News and Events. http://bit.ly/2pL07RA.
[60] National Security Agency (2017). NSA Stops Certain Foreign Intelligence Collection Activities Under Section 702. http://bit.ly/2sbL0o0.
[61] The Guardian (2017). NSA concedes violating surveillance limits and pledges curbs on US email collection. http://bit.ly/2rZgnyF.
[62] New York Times (2017). N.S.A. Halts Collection of Americans’ Emails About Foreign Targets. http://nyti.ms/2pKgptp.
[63] New York Times (2017). Federal Court Revives Wikimedia’s Challenge to N.S.A. Surveillance. http://nyti.ms/2rFymKo.
[64] Washington Post (2017). Spy agencies seek permanent authority for contested surveillance program. http://wapo.st/2slSC4d.
[65] 60 Minutes (2016). Collateral Damage. CBS News. http://cbsn.ws/1Nvsii1.
[66] Arstechnica.com (2015). America’s super-secret court names five lawyers as public advocates. http://bit.ly/2srS5Cx.
[67] Los Angeles Times (2016). U.S. spy court judge dismissed privacy advocate's concerns about data use. http://lat.ms/2twW4NQ.
[68] Office of National Director of Intelligence (2017). Statistical Transparency Report Regarding Use of National Securities Authorities for Calendar Year 2016. http://bit.ly/2pwI3P5.
[69] Legal Information Institute (n.d.). 50 U.S. Code § 1809 - Criminal sanctions. Cornell Law School. http://bit.ly/2thwNYk.
[70] CNN (2017). The actual reason for Wednesday's Russia hearing. http://cnn.it/2siOwhn.
[71] Senate Committee on the Judiciary. The FISA Amendments Act: Reauthorizing America’s Vital National Security Authority and Protecting Privacy and Civil Liberties. http://bit.ly/2tt43cn.
- 原標題:華裔是“永久的外國人”?對FISA修正案及702條款的分析 本文僅代表作者個人觀點。
- 責任編輯:宋煜昊
-
最新聞 Hot
-
“沙特曾多次警告德國提防嫌疑人”
-
特朗普最新任命!這次包括火箭隊老板、真人秀制作人
-
巴勒斯坦三個政治派別發表聯合聲明
-
“中國在非洲真正贏得了民心,就連斯威士蘭…”
-
“日企抱團是絕望之舉,中國工廠效率質量都是第一”
-
“中國有能力讓夢想照進現實,將贏得史詩般競爭”
-
被災民暴罵到當場破防,馬克龍發飆:你該慶幸你在法國!
-
美高校敦促國際學生抓緊回來:萬一把中印拉黑名單呢
-
美國政府“逃過一劫”
-
“澤連斯基要求歐盟新外長:對華批評要降調”
-
澳大利亞來了,中國就得走人?澳總理這么回應
-
美媒感慨:基建狂魔發力,我們又要被超越了
-
英國剛公布新任大使,特朗普顧問就痛罵:傻X
-
“來自中國的老大哥能確保我們…”
-
俄羅斯的報復來了
-
澤連斯基罵普京“傻子”,俄方怒斥
-